So long, Mr. Diddley. Thanks for everything!

FORUM Forums Other Topics Singers and Songwriters So long, Mr. Diddley. Thanks for everything!

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #29261
    Lefty
    Participant

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/03/arts/music/03diddley.html?hp

    “I opened the door for a lot of people, and they just ran through and left me holding the knob.”

    #35895
    stellablueee
    Participant

    AN APPRECIATION
    The night Bo Diddley banned the Beat
    How do you play with a legend without doing it the legendary way? By
    learning his lesson of keeping himself new.
    By Dave Alvin, Special to The Times
    3:35 PM PDT, June 2, 2008

    “Whatever you do, DO NOT play ‘the Beat!'”

    That was the first thing Bo Diddley said to us before we walked onto
    the stage of the Music Machine club in West L.A. for two sets back
    in 1983. We were a mix of members of the Blasters and X who had
    agreed, with great enthusiasm, to back up one of our greatest heroes
    for free at a benefit show for the Southern California Blues Society.

    To say that we were upset by his announcement/warning would be an
    understatement. How could you play Bo Diddley songs and not play the
    powerful, infectious and sensual Bo Diddley Beat?

    Bo Diddley, 79; his beat marked rock ‘n’ roll Since Bo’s first
    records for the Chess label back in the mid-’50s, his “Beat” (a
    primal and relentless mix of the old shave-and-a-haircut riff,
    Chicago blues grooves and Latin rhythms), had been borrowed, stolen
    or adapted by everyone from Buddy Holly to the Rolling Stones to
    David Bowie for their own hit records.

    Now, even though Bo had utilized various permutations of the beat
    over the course of his long career, he was asking us to abandon it
    entirely in favor of . . . What? It’s sort of like asking an actor
    to do Hamlet, but don’t use any of Shakespeare’s words.

    Blasters drummer Bill Bateman and X drummer DJ Bonebreak, who were
    sharing the drum and percussion duties for the night, asked Bo to
    clarify what beat they should play. He tapped out some rhythm that
    stressed a different accent but, to be honest, I couldn’t tell what
    the difference was. Fortunately, Bill and DJ picked up on his
    instructions and by the end of the first song Bo seemed pretty happy.

    It was a very good band, with Bill and DJ teaming up for the
    essential duties on drums, timbales and maracas, X’s John Doe and
    Blasters bassist John Bazz sharing the bass position while my
    brother Phil, who also played some harmonica, and I followed Bo as
    best we could on guitars.

    Most of the songs in the first set were new songs that Bo had
    recently recorded but none of us had ever heard, let alone studied.
    We (and just about every other musician in the modern age) had been
    dissecting all of his old records for years with the passion of
    theology students pouring over the Dead Sea scrolls or physicists
    debating string theory. A couple of the songs in the set were
    straight blues that easily fell into a comfortable pocket, but the
    rest were extended one-chord, semi-funk jams that wound up sounding
    as much like “Bitches Brew”-era Miles Davis as they did classic Bo
    Diddley.

    As the set progressed and I began to get comfortable with Bo’s new
    beats, I started thinking that it was close-minded of me to expect
    him to play the old songs the same old way. Wasn’t Bo Diddley as
    much of a musical revolutionary as Bob Dylan? Weren’t his original
    recordings of “Mona” or “Who Do You Love” as musically unique,
    pivotal and influential in their day as Dylan’s?

    Maybe Bo wasn’t the genius lyricist that Dylan is but in rock ‘n’
    roll (or blues and folk), lyrics aren’t everything. If Dylan could
    change the melodies, grooves and even lyrics to his songs in order
    to keep exploring the possibilities of his art, why couldn’t Bo
    Diddley?

    Some people would argue that Bo was one of the architects of funk
    and, if that’s the case, why shouldn’t he be allowed to follow his
    own rhythmic path to wherever it might lead him? Why should Bo
    Diddley have to be stuck in the past just because that’s where a
    part of his audience (and perhaps his backing bands) wanted him to
    remain?

    I remember smiling on stage like a goofball as I realized all of
    this and came to the conclusion that if you really dig Bo Diddley,
    then let Bo Diddley be Bo Diddley! I was a young guy at the time who
    was trying his best to replicate old music — and that’s the best
    way to learn, believe me — but that night Bo taught me a lesson
    about growing and surviving as an musician/artist: Stay true to
    yourself.

    After the first set I approached Bo backstage and told him what I
    had been thinking while I played with him. “That’s right,” he said
    laughing. “I already made all them old records years ago. Now I’m
    keeping myself new.”

    But as we walked back onstage for the second set, Bo turned to us,
    smiled and said, “You know, you boys are pretty good, so I’ll tell
    what: The first song is gonna be ‘Mona’ and you can play with the Bo
    Diddley beat.” And we did.

    Thank you Bo, for all your incredible music over the years and,
    especially, the wise life lesson you taught me.

    Singer, songwriter and guitarist Dave Alvin has been a member of the
    Blasters, X and the Knitters and leads his own roots-rock group, the
    Guilty Men.

    http://tinyurl.com/459hv2

    i’m going to go hear the hacienda brothers/dave alvin this thursday to show them some love (their first show since chris gaffney’s passing)
    should be bittersweet…

    lisa

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.