FORUM › Forums › Other Topics › Singers and Songwriters › NEIL!
- This topic has 300 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 1 month ago by Lafayette.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 28, 2009 at 9:51 pm #33193LWjettaParticipant
Mark your calendar for June 10th to watch American Masters on PBS
Supposedly to celebrate the 1st archives release
Here is the linkhttp://www.pbs.org/wnet/americanmasters/
May 29, 2009 at 12:13 pm #33194LeftyParticipantThanks for the heads-up, LWj.
Now – – is there even the slightest chance that Neil will find a way to have this broadcast postponed?!
tonyg: your thoughts? 😉May 29, 2009 at 5:21 pm #33195tonygKeymasterNaw, I think you can plan on seeing this. It is the show broadcast on the BBC last fall, and is excellent in the extreme. If you only see one TV show about Neil, this is the one. He is extensivley interviewed throughout the show. He is one weird guy.
😆
May 29, 2009 at 6:00 pm #33196LeftyParticipanthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfjbOUZcS14
Powderfinger!
8)May 29, 2009 at 8:21 pm #33197LeftyParticipanthttp://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2009/05/neil-youngs-philosophy-on-recording-lets-roll.html
May 30, 2009 at 9:38 pm #33198LWjettaParticipantFrom today’s edition of the Toronto Star
The writer ( Ben Rayner ) sat down and listened , watched an advance copy of Vol. 1 Archives over an 8 hour sitting with lots of beer .
He started by snapping the package’s nifty magnetic lock open.
Enjoy.
http://www.thestar.com/Article/642158
LWjMay 30, 2009 at 11:49 pm #33199tonygKeymasterGood stuff. Too bad he didn’t buy the Blu Ray version. Thx for the link.
June 1, 2009 at 3:34 pm #33190TimParticipantLefty, thank you for posting that incredible clip of “Powderfinger”. I needed it bad; it made my day!
June 1, 2009 at 4:33 pm #33191LeftyParticipantMy pleasure, Tim.
Thanks, LWj, for the link.
More on NEIL!:
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-ca-neilyoung31-2009may31,0,2941222.story
June 4, 2009 at 7:47 pm #33200LeftyParticipantPop Notes
Night at the Museum
by Ben Greenman (The New Yorker)
June 8, 2009It’s been thirty years since Neil Young first sang “Hey hey, my my / Rock and roll can never die,” and he’s certainly done his part to preserve the form, remaining a vital and even controversial artist well into his sixties. But he’s also become a trailblazer in the art of the curated career retrospective. In 1977, Young released the triple-album compilation “Decade,” and, within a few years, he began to discuss the possibility of a sequel, a massive release that would recapture every detail from every phase of his long career. The project has been whispered about for at least twenty years, and in the last two years several release dates have been set and then reset. Now it’s finally here, and to say that it’s mammoth is something of an understatement, like saying “Live Rust” is loud.
“Archives Vol. 1 (1963-1972)” (Reprise) comes in three formats: an eight-CD version, which goes for around a hundred dollars; a ten-DVD set, for around two hundred; and the ne plus ultra, a ten-disk Blu-ray box, for three hundred. The CD version, an audio-only tour through Young’s early albums, outtakes, demos, and live performances, is underwhelming, a 2008 format in a 2009 world. The broader vision becomes clear in the multimedia versions, which supplement each song with photographs, concert footage, radio interviews, and images of everything from tickets to posters to sheet music. The set tracks Young from his earliest professional efforts—the 1963 surf-rock instrumental single “The Sultan”—to early-seventies landmarks like “After the Gold Rush” and “Harvest.” The Blu-ray version has more sophisticated navigation; the DVD set matches the hardware capabilities of more fans. And while the switching of disks can grow tiresome—if you’re listening to an early demo of “Sugar Mountain” and want to hear “Tell Me Why,” you’ll have to eject the first disk and insert the seventh—the wealth of material available is staggering. There are plenty of diverting hidden features, too, like footage of the present-day Young looking through his own memorabilia.
There’s a paradox here. Earlier this year, on “Fork in the Road,” Young lamented economic pressures, self-centered thinking, and corporate greed; now he’s charging through the nose for the most self-aggrandizing product imaginable. But, as music becomes more and more difficult to monetize, the rock-and-roll world must grapple with new profit models. Young’s fusion of history and commerce may point the way out of the cul-de-sac. The question is how many artists will amass a body of work that rewards this kind of treatment. Here’s one, at least.June 9, 2009 at 12:27 am #33192LWjettaParticipantRe Unpacking Neil’s Archives Vol. 1 in Blu ray format.
This is from You Tube done to the classical music of “Song of Joy”
Enjoy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GFaVs2QYSE
LWj
June 27, 2009 at 1:03 pm #33189LeftyParticipantThis post of an old post from who knows where was posted recently at the neverending pool Dylan site:
PETER HERBST
(Posted: Aug 11, 1977)AMERICAN STARS ‘N’ BARS
Right now, I think it would be just about impossible to overrate Neil Young. In the last few years he has wed the most avant-garde styles to the corniest of archetypes-and deliberately ignored the public’s penchant for pasteurized product by rampantly (im)perfecting Bob Dylan’s crude but spontaneous recording technique. Seething with psychic dynamite, his raw and passionate electric-guitar playing boasts a tactility and uniqueness unmatched by any guitarist since Jimi Hendrix. Young has written songs as sensitive and beautiful as any by the most fragile and aesthetic singer/songwriter, yet he has played life-and-death rock & roll with the delirious ferociousness of the Rolling Stones at their most sordid and seedy. Of course, he has been misunderstood too quickly.
Since After the Gold Rush (1970) and Harvest (1972), many erstwhile admirers have filed strong charges of morbid self-indulgence and drugged-out incomprehensiveness against the later LPs. In The Rolling Stone Illustrated History of Rock & Roll, Janet Maslin wrote: “With On the Beach, 1974, Tonight’s the Night and Zuma, both from 1975, Young’s progressively more rudimentary music did little more than reiterate the murkiness of his lyrics. His renunciation of artifice was so absolute it left him no room for either drama or tension.” In the New York Times, John Rockwell, in a highly favorable review, characterized Young as “the quintessential hippie-cowboy loner, a hopeless romantic struggling to build bridges out from himself to women and through them to cosmic archetypes of the past and of myth.” Well, no.
Unless one understands the “On the Beach”/”Motion Pictures”/”Ambulance Blues” trilogy from On the Beach (and “Don’t Be Denied” from Time Fades Away), one simply cannot write intelligently about Neil Young. But when one understands these songs, one begins to perceive the exciting possibility that perhaps Young is rock & roll’s first (and only?) postromantic. That he knows something that we don’t, but should. Indeed, I suspect that Young took one of the longest journeys without maps on record, never even slowed up at the point of no return, but somehow got back anyway, a better man with all senses intact. When nearly overwhelmed by marital difficulties and the death of friends, he apparently looked into himself and managed an instinctive or willed act of Jungian purification that put him somewhat safely on the far side of paradise, if not paradox. I’m not saying he’s happy, but who the hell is happy? For Young, being a postromantic probably means he still loves the war, but knows exactly how and where to invest his combat pay-he may lose it, but never hopelessly. Romanticism is a foreign country; they do things differently there. It’s a nice place to visit, but I wouldn’t want to live there. Too homicidal.
Having gotten through the more self-destructive aspects of romanticism, Neil Young certainly takes full advantage of his revisiting privileges, pointing out the highlights and contradictions of his itinerary to all who will listen. Perhaps only a man who has known the answers can really see both sides of the questions. At any rate, Young’s Mona Lisa smile from the barroom floor on the curious American Stars ‘n Bars isn’t so much arrogant (“If you can’t cut it/Don’t pick up the knife”) as it is inclusive (“I know that all things pass/Let’s try to make this last”). So inclusive, in fact, that the album can almost be taken as a sampler, but not a summation, of Young’s various styles from After the Gold Rush and Harvest (much of the country rock) through On the Beach (the incredible “Will to Love”) to Zuma (“Like a Hurricane”) is a worthy successor to “Cortez the Killer” as a guitar showcase, with a lot of overlap within the songs.
If one can divide American Stars ‘n Bars into major and minor Neil Young, I think that it breaks down this way: “The Old Country Waltz,” “Saddle Up the Palomino,” “Hey Babe,” “Bite the Bullet” and “Homegrown” are excellent examples of country rock at its most pleasant and muscular. While these songs abstain from cloyingness and retain the artist’s characteristic idiosyncrasies (Young is nothing if not quirky), they lack the necessary resonance to stand up to the LP’s four masterpieces.
In “Hold Back the Tears” and “Star of Bethlehem,” two songs about how it feels when you’ve just been left and didn’t want to be, a corrosive view of love metamorphoses into hopefulness (“Hold back the tears and keep on trying/Just around the next corner may be waiting your true love”), with a final metaphor equating the inevitability of the quest for a meaningful relationship with the apotheosis of the religious experience.
Which leads right into the shining “Will to Love,” a song that flies into the face of reason by flaunting the seemingly ridiculous-the thoughts of the singer as a salmon swimming upstream-in order to gain the truly sublime. And it works. (When was the last time you heard something like this on record?) Starting with a typical Young epigram (“It has often been my dream/To live with one who wasn’t there”), the song moves from the manic to the depressive (the two lines about “a fire in the night”) to a combination of both (“Now my fins are in the air/And my belly’s scraping on the rocks”) before homing in on the universal plight (“I remember the ocean from where I came/Just one of millions all the same …”) and promise (“. . . but somewhere someone calls my name.”
If Young’s triumph is that he will never lose the way to love, his need to locate that special someone can certainly cause tribulations. “Like a Hurricane,” with its gale-force guitar playing, is a perfect either/or, neither/nor description of a modern-day Gatsby caught between the tangible idea of transcendental love and the intangible reality of it. Everything is “hazy,” “foggy,” lit by “moonbeam” and “the light from star to star.”
I am just a dreamer
But you are just a dream
And you could have been anyone to me
Before that moment you touched my lips
That perfect feeling when time just slips
Away between us and our foggy tripThe first three lines imply that the singer’s need to invent someone to love may be far greater than the someone he finds. One can infer from the last three lines that the feeling gained from the creation and the chance taken is undoubtedly worth it, no matter what the cost. Is there a happy ending? I don’t think so. “I want to love you/But I’m getting blown away,” Young sings. It’s like Key Largo with feedback.
Although he may be circling in a peculiar and seemingly haphazard manner (some claim he has as many as nine unreleased albums), Neil Young has a very good chance to be the most important American rock & roll artist in the Seventies. Bruce Springsteen, Jackson Browne and others must be considered, of course, but I don’t know anyone who goes after the essences with as much daring as Young. I don’t know anyone who finds them like he does either.
PAUL NELSON
(Posted: Aug 11, 1977)August 13, 2009 at 4:58 am #33186LafayetteParticipanthttp://www.examiner.com/x-13964-Boston-Rock-Music-Examiner~y2009m8d12-Neil-Young-To-Be-Honored-At-2010-Grammy-Awards
August 13, 2009 at 11:55 am #33187LeftyParticipantThe picture of NEIL! from that link, CB, is a mite scary… 😯
August 13, 2009 at 4:47 pm #33188LafayetteParticipantAgreed, Lefty! Certainly, the photo choice was not the best. Neil, perhaps, should always wear a hat on stage, just in case…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.