FORUM › Forums › Lucinda Williams › Lucinda in general › Miller Williams
- This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by kentmcm.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 21, 2009 at 11:53 pm #29734stevarinoParticipant
To my surprise my wife brought home Miller Williams “The Ways We Touch” and “Time and Tilting Earth” from the library this past week. I read the second one cover to cover today and then went back and started re-reading them. Very interesting and engaging thoughts about life, the universe, god and relationships. And many thoughts on getting old and dying since he is 75 and says:
Think of yourself as a plumbing system, a clock.
As soon as you’re done, you start to come undone.
It’s almost interesting when you pay attention,
how working parts stop working, one by one.….Still, I think
I could hang a few more calendars on the door.I ordered the hardcover version of Time and Tilting Earth today. Seems like a collection of poems I’ll re-read over and over.
Steve
March 22, 2009 at 1:06 am #39278RayParticipantSteverino, in that vein, there is a wonderful poem about what a father leaves his children “when all is said and done.” It’s in MW’s collection Imperfect Love (1986) and titled “For Lucinda, Robert, and Karyn.”
I’d type it in here, but (partly out of respect for copyright, and more because the emotion in that poem is stronger without a clumsy introduction from me), I’ll just highly recommend it to all.
March 22, 2009 at 7:06 am #39279kentmcmParticipantI admire Miller Williams’ work every bit as much as I do Lucinda’s and have been trying to decide how to describe the differences in the voices of their writing, the approaches to their material.
It seems to me that they’re similar personality types, only Miller is likely an introvert and Lucinda an extrovert. Using the practical system of description of personality that the Swiss psychologist, C.G. Jung devised, I’d be willing to bet that Lucinda is an Extroverted Intuitive Feeling type, an ENFP in the Myers-Briggs elaboration of Jung’s typology.
I don’t get nearly as strong a feeling content from Miller’s work as is in Lucinda’s. Naturally, it permeates his poems, but not front and center. They are more an account of someone with very deeply held convictions, but always in the background, lurking beneath the surface of the narrative.
One of the more interesting things I’ve read about Miller is that he began college as an English major, was persuaded to study biology instead, pursued medical studies, and actually taught biology before his return to an English department as a faculty member upon the recommendation of Flannery O’Connor. I would guess that he’s the introverted version of his daughter’s type, an INFJ.
I apologize if this psychologizing is obnoxious. Somehow, I doubt that Miller would mind the dissection. He’d object to getting it wrong – if I have – and the brief, lifeless descriptions of something as complicated as personality.
Kent
March 22, 2009 at 7:41 pm #39277kentmcmParticipantJust as a footnote to the above bit of amateur psychology, here are links to a couple of descriptions of the two personality types mentioned, Lucinda’s ENFP:
http://typelogic.com/enfp.html
and Miller’s INFJ:
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.